deguit olavides chap 6(comments in parentheses in between sentences)

However, the female respondents only agreed that their ideal guy is someone who who (check) attends church activities.
On the other hand, in terms of family relationship, twenty-two out (22) of 30 female respondents unanimously voted a guy who obeys his parents,
Nineteen about of 30Female (spacing) respondents want their ideal guy to have an above average mental capacity and none of them want a gut that has a below average mental capacity.

Based on the data gathered by the researchers, it can be concluded that since the respondents of the study are female students at the age of 16-18 which meas that they are already in the middle adolescence stage and are already capable of choosing who they want to be with. (fragment)
It can be concluded that the personality of the guy is the most important factor the female respondents consider in choosing their ideal guy, Based (check) on the ranking of the different factors of personality, the female respondents would want a guy that has a good characteristics (faulty), good family relationship, has no vices, and values religion, respectively. (problematic sentence)
This shows that the female respondents think that a guy who is handsome on the inside is way better than a guy who is beautiful on the outside. (so what can you say about the result?your insight/opinion)
Recommendations:
1. The researchers recommend that for the next researchers who would choose the same study, they should include the factors (i.e. family, media, environment, etc) that affect the criteria set by the female respondents in choosing their ideal guy.
2. The researchers recommend for further researchers to include more theses in order to support the study so that the foundation of their research is strong.
3. The researchers also recommend that the next researchers should put more characteristics of the guy so as not to limit the female respondents' choices.
4. The next researchers should also ask the female respondents who they think is their ideal guy so as to have a basis on why they choose the characteristics given by the researchers in order to help in interpreting the result.

(researchers and researchers. Confusing and awkward.give justification for every recommendation.)