Chapter 2
1. (“Surviving adolescence – a tool kit for parents”, 2004). (why title? No author or name of org?)
2. Adolescence is perhaps the most critical of all life stages. It starts during the twelfth or thirteenth year of the person to the nineteenth or the twentieth. Despite this grouping, there are still no definite chronological age boundaries separating adolescence from childhood and adulthood. A huge amount of changes occur in an adolescent’s body physically, emotionally, and psychologically. Physical changes include growth in height, hormones, and reproductive organs. Emotional changes, usually resulting from psychological changes, include heightened awareness and participation in love, friendship, an even depression. (recognition of sources?)
3. There are 4 types (express number in words if less than 10)
4. the world and it’s constituents (check)
5. In line with the University of the Philippines (what?; expression in possessive form) as the premier national university of the country
6. “Choosing a Major”, , n.d.) NO author, name of org? no year, otherwise cannot be considered credible)
7. Freedom to express one’s self is already taught widespread in schools in the Philippines. Liberalism and freedom of expression has become a common trend, a common goal for most schools with students vying for increased “freedom” and independence. (recognition of source)
8. The presence of stress in the body can promote either positive or negative effects; however, it is a matter of quantity separating the two. Moderate amount of stress can be positive for the body, since it activates certain organs and hormones that may have been quite dormant when stress was absent in the body. (citation)
9. (“Dealing with stress during college”, 2007). (author? Name of org?)
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
The study weighs the pressures brought by GE and major subjects to second year UP students. This chapter explains the basic concepts and the major topics of the study: the definition and scope of adolescence, the process of learning, the teaching process, and the nature of the student. The literature about the integration of these concepts into the Philippine setting: the Filipino adolescent and the Filipino college and student are discussed. In relation to the main study, the definition, effects, implications, and sources of stress are also discussed. The review is important since it explains the concepts used in the study and their incorporation into the study’s main problem. The chapter ends with a summary of the literature review.
THE STAGE OF ADOLESCENCE
Considering that our study targets are college students, and these students are mostly, if not all, adolescents, it is therefore a necessity that we tackle adolescence for a good background of the nature of our subjects, especially in the cognitive and biological aspects.
Adolescence is perhaps the most critical of all life stages. It starts during the twelfth or thirteenth year of the person to the nineteenth or the twentieth. Despite this grouping, there are still no definite chronological age boundaries separating adolescence from childhood and adulthood. A huge amount of changes occur in an adolescent’s body physically, emotionally, and psychologically. Physical changes include growth in height, hormones, and reproductive organs. Emotional changes, usually resulting from psychological changes, include heightened awareness and participation in love, friendship, an even depression. Psychological changes refer to the developing semi-mature mindset of the adolescents like the formation of more relationships outside the family, improved decision-making strategies, improved preferences, and a more developed learning capacity (“Surviving adolescence – a tool kit for parents”, 2004).
Situated between immaturity and maturity, the stage permits naïve and mature thinking alternating on indefinite intervals during the person’s development. According to Kelly (1965), the events that happen during this stage help to form the basic qualities and characteristics of these young people. New thoughts and experiences pave the way for the individual’s social, sex, and self-awareness. New-found vigor, enthusiasm and energy become bases for the adolescent’s innate daredevil and nature of devotion towards anything of interest.
There is a measure of complexity found in adolescents. They carry their way through their developing years in constant struggle as they try to find meaning and purpose for their lives. Considered to be a person’s adjustment stage, adolescence solidifies the concepts of strenuous effort and decision-making problems that would eventually help in the adolescents’ development. As the adolescents go through this critical stage, they undergo the arduous course of higher education and learning.
THE PROCESS OF LEARNING
There is perhaps no single definition for the process of learning. The acquisition of knowledge varies from person to person and culture to culture. The amount of knowledge gained and the process by which people gain the knowledge differ across nations and between individual personalities. According to Kelly (1965), the process of learning is an important practice that would eventually lead people to great development as they go through life.
There are 4 types of learning indicated by Kelly: (a) rational, when learning is intellectual in nature and involves judgment and reasoning, (b) motor, when the skills are being learned, (c) associative, when it involves memory and association processes, and (d) appreciative, when it deals with emotions, behavior/attitudes and ideals. Optimal learning is achieved when all four types of learning are present and there is development shown by the student.
People should, however, also learn to measure their capacity for learning and their knowledge. The learning process should meet a condition to which it is to take place successfully. The learning process is being conditioned by intelligence that there is a big possibility that a person will learn more if he/she has a high intelligence rate (Isidro, 1952).
In line with Kelly’s idea that “learning involves mental activity by means of which knowledge and skills are acquired, retained, and utilized” (p. 188), every grain of information gained by people adds to the countless numbers of facts, details, and experiences they store in their heads.
This, in effect, greatly affects two important parts of higher education: the teacher and the student. The process’ objectives heavily influence the school situation. The attainment of certain knowledge, the development of abilities, the acquisition of patterns of behavior, and the capability to function logically and independently heavily rely on the individual’s learning process and personality.
THE TEACHING PROCESS AND THE NATURE OF THE STUDENT
According to Battle and Shannon (1968), teaching is a process of arranging circumstances in which the student changes his ways deliberately in the direction of his goals. The teachers’ part in the process is a great one since they become the primary givers and sharers of knowledge in the school setting, which will shape the learner and make him/her consciously apply his knowledge to his goals. With this in mind, the teachers must be effective in communicating to their students what they wish to teach. Battle and Shannon (1968) said that there are two characteristics of a good teacher: he/she should be, first and foremost, an interesting person, and he/she must be well-educated especially in his field of expertise.
To be able to reach a point of interaction with their students, teachers must develop their curriculum. At this point in time, there is no proper definition of the curriculum, since different sources usually contradict. Aquino (1986) mentioned that the word curriculum, through the years, has achieved various definitions and contexts. Some of these are curricula explained as: subjects taught in school, the subject matter itself, the course and/or program of study, learning outcomes to be attained both by teacher and student, teaching strategies applied by teachers, learners’ engagements, planned experiences in and out of school, the total environment of the learner, and all of the learning experiences of the child.
Dennise and Kauffman (1966), however, pointed out that a curriculum is only appropriate when intellectual progress is experienced wholly by the students. Therefore, in order to be successful, the teachers must be able to efficiently use their curriculum to further the students’ best interests and to properly share what they themselves were taught.
The teaching process coexists with the learning process, for without the former, the latter would simply be nonexistent. The students would be nonexistent if there would be no teachers, and, similarly, the lessons would be useless if there were no people being taught.
Consistent with the ideas presented above, the students, on the other hand, must be able to associate the teachings of one teacher with another. They must be able to integrate their knowledge properly into their projects, assignments, and perhaps their lives, to prove that they have indeed learnt something from the subject and that the teachers were successful in their efforts to impart knowledge to them. This idea identifies with the learning process.
According to Isidro (1952), “education depends upon emotion for the motivation of learning and for personality adjustment” (p. 10). In school work, it is said that praising a student after the things he/she did is approved for the betterment of the student. In addition to this, Dewey (1968) said that the problem of students is found in the subject matter itself. The teacher’s problem should be what the students think of the subject matter.
In line with this, aside from the students’ responsibilities in the learning process, the teachers must also consider the mental capacity and interest of their students as well as their own academic proficiency. There is a positive relationship between the two explaining that, most of the time, the students’ academic achievement reflects the teachers’ proficiency in his lessons (Goldhaber, 2003). Too much in too little time may overwork the brain and too little in too much time may hinder quantitative learning. The students must know their own capabilities in order for smooth communication to ensue between them and their teachers. A give-and-take relationship must happen between the teacher and student.
HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE PHILIPPINES
According to Battle and Shannon (1968), the main purpose of a certain university is that it should prepare the students for their personal success. The college curricula in the Philippines, just like in any other countries, seek to promote the best possible learning experience to the students in order for the students to indeed be successful.
The presence of the General Education (GE) program in colleges across the country proved to be a valuable source of general knowledge. Cohen, 1988 stated in his article that:
General education is the process of developing a framework on which to place knowledge stemming from various sources. Its goals are to help students think critically, develop values, understand traditions, respect diverse cultures and opinions, and most important, put that knowledge to use. It is holistic, not specialized; integrative, not fractioned; suitable less for abstract contemplation than for application. (par. 2)
Therefore, as a basic principle, students are made to use their minds to understand and appreciate the world and it’s constituents, and not just the intricacies of their major.
Liberal education and general education in the Philippine context is the basic, holistic appreciation of life and humans. It makes the people realize that humans themselves are a part of the country, a member of a democratic community. It teaches the people how to think, reason, judge, and question things. It doesn’t just teach and help in intellectual growth, but it also helps in molding the moral values of the country (Magno, 2010). In line with the University of the Philippines as the premier national university of the country, the school’s GE courses aim to develop the students in almost all aspects of their lives. This is called “common minimum general education” (Doronila, 1993).
The latest revitalization of the GE Program of the University of the Philippines allows the students to choose their own GE courses, based on their specific fields of interest. The idea is to make the students learn, on their part, since they “perform better in courses which they choose rather than in courses that they have no interest in but are required to take” (“The Revitalized GE Program”, 2009).
Major subjects, on the other hand, are present in the system because, primarily, without having subjects for your major degree, the college/university will not give you a degree at all (“Choosing a Major”, n.d.).
A major subject is defined, simply, as one of the subjects/classes you take under your baccalaureate degree, which you choose to concentrate on and explore thoroughly (“Choosing a Major”, n.d.). Major subjects mostly vary, especially in different degrees taken.
In the Philippines, a good percentage of major subjects vary from school to school and degree to degree, depending also on the schools’ fields of concentration. As opposed to GE courses, major subjects are not chosen, for they are strictly required by the school for completion of the degree (“Choosing a Major”, n.d.). If one major class was not taken, the student usually stays longer in the university to compensate for the missed class and continue the course. If one failed a major subject, the student usually retakes the class and becomes an irregular student in the next semester if the subject failed was a prerequisite.
THE PHILIPPINE STUDENT
According to Mangubat (1970), the Philippines has given equal opportunities for the rich and poor to be educated and take courses that they like, of their own choosing. This system, however, did not succeed because of early elimination and dropping out of students. Poverty remains a huge factor in Philippine education simply because most families cannot afford to send their children to school, especially to college. The Filipino mindset remains: most poor families would think that they would rather have their children work immediately to alleviate their poverty, rather than go through at least four years of college, which they look at as more additional pay to the many expenses they already have.
To add to the aforementioned dilemma of the Filipino people, education is partially a process of social conditioning. According to Isidro (1952): a Filipino student is living in an environment not suitable for learning since there are contradictions between the culture and science. A child may be hindered from going to school, even if he wishes to, because of the contradiction between the two.
The education as of today, Mangubat (1970) wrote, is slowly becoming more democratic and liberal. Freedom to express one’s self is already taught widespread in schools in the Philippines. Liberalism and freedom of expression has become a common trend, a common goal for most schools with students vying for increased “freedom” and independence.
STRESS
Rice (1999) stated that there are three formal definitions of stress according to contemporary scientific writings: (a) it is a stimulus causing tension and arousal, (b) a subjective response to tension and arousal, and (c) the body’s reactions to certain demands.
According to Starke (1990), stress involves a set of challenges gained from the environment: physical challenges such as hunger, thirst, and health issues, and psychological challenges like deprivation, loss, and adaptation. Stress occurs especially during times when an immediate or a delayed solution is needed upon facing a problem.
The presence of stress in the body can promote either positive or negative effects; however, it is a matter of quantity separating the two. Moderate amount of stress can be positive for the body, since it activates certain organs and hormones that may have been quite dormant when stress was absent in the body. Too much stress can indeed be negative for the body since the body may not be able to cope with the pressures the individual is experiencing (“Dealing with stress during college”, 2007). Certain organs may refrain from functioning due to overworking, and the body may lose the energy it desperately needs in order to function well.
Alix, et al. (1992) stated that important coping predictors are: (1) the person, and (2) the environment and variables that are situational. By coping, students will be able to deal with their stressors and will be able to properly manage their time.
Using the Student Stress Survey and according to the table given by Ross, Niebling, and Heckert (1999) in their thesis, there are five top stressors common in students: “change in sleeping habits (89%), vacation or break (82%), change in eating habits (74%), new responsibilities (73%), and increased workload (73%)” (par. 10). The said data was taken during springtime, when students were busy planning their breaks from school. This means that, time is also a major factor affecting the students’ responses to certain stress tests. The duration of a given situation and the set dates for certain occasions may and will affect the stress levels of students. Apart from inflicting pressure on the student, time may set the boundaries for stress and stress management.
Aside from the stressors mentioned above, perhaps the greatest stressor of all students is getting grades that are lower than what they expected received (Greenwald and Gillmore, 1997). Students have grade aspirations, which are their expectations for appropriate grades—and these have two effects: (a) work regulation—adjustment of student’s work level to achieve the grade, and (b) grade satisfaction—satisfaction in the course reflects in the grade. Undue stress may result from not studying and/or too much studying.
Freshmen and Sophomores have higher levels of stress, because they don’t yet have the “strong support network” that Juniors and Seniors have developed. They have not yet developed their “coping mechanisms” that would help them in dealing with and avoiding stress. Freshmen have a hard time getting into new practices in school and dealing with the new culture and environment (Misra, et al., 2000). Although, with the use of assimilation and accommodation, the Freshmen, in time, will be able to properly adapt to the new environment an culture (Piaget, 1952). Sophomores experience stress due to more academic pressures. Both year levels are emotionally, physically, and intellectually unstable, unlike the Juniors and Seniors who are more well-developed (Misra, et al., 2000).
Among the many stresses in college, diffusion—trying to do things that are beyond the individual’s capabilities—is, by far, one of the most common. Rice (1999) said that mental diffusion causes dysfunctional problems, less concentration and less motivation in doing tasks. Keeping up with such activities produces a “toll” on one’s body through physical fatigue and a “battered mind syndrome”. Diffusion does not make people realize their own limitations and does not keep them from saying no to anyone who asks for help. This will result in mental and physical overload if it does not stop.
SUMMARY
The interrelations between the college adolescent, learning, and stress is evident in this review. The physical, emotional, and psychological characteristics of adolescence all play important roles in the formation of the cognitive capacities of a person (“Surviving adolescence – a tool kit for parents”, 2004). This cognitive capacity is responsible for the process of learning inherent in each and every person. As a result, the mental capacity of a person depends greatly on his inherent process of learning, giving the idea that even though people may go through similar experiences, they may have differing views and interpretations of the experiences (Kelly, 1965). This correlation also relates to the two parts of the learning process: the teacher and the student (Battle and Shannon, 1968). The teachers should seek to understand the capacities and capabilities of their students in order to formulate an effective curriculum (Battle and Shannon, 1968). Success in this area depends on the academic proficiency of the teacher as well as the availability of learning materials and the attention and aptitude of the student (Dennise and Kauffman, 1996).
With this in mind, the Philippine colleges may be studied and understood. By knowing the Philippines’ stand on education and the current educational status of Filipinos, it is therefore apparent that tertiary education is a rarity for the poor. Certain features available for the private, richer schools may not be available for public schools.
Liberalism and freedom of expression has become evident in today’s schools (Doronila, 1993). More and more universities are adhering to the policies of democratic education given by the school councils, and this has become a major influence to the kind of education given in varying schools.
The Formation of the General Education (GE) Program, however, is open for all kinds of tertiary schools. It is already a requirement for all the colleges to have their own GE curriculum, for the more holistic approach to tertiary education. The Revitalized GE Program of the University of the Philippines helps in maintaining a successful and effective GE program for its students (“The Revitalized GE Program”, 2009). As these factors continue to make better the education of the country, the unavoidable stress level of the students increase indefinitely.
Stress is the major contributing factor for both positive development and negative deterioration of students. The only important factor is that they are measured quantitatively and may give different results to the student (Rice, 1999).
The usual stress sources in college students come from changes in the environment and their own habits (Starke, 1990). Freshmen and Sophomores gain more stress in college since they are yet to adapt fully to the environment, and the pressures they receive have not yet been fully dealt with by their bodies (Misra, et al., 2000). Diffusion (Rice, 1999) also becomes a huge factor in this area.
The characteristics of adolescents greatly affect their learning process, which in turn is affected by the teaching process of their professors, as well as their own student nature. Assessing the status of colleges in the Philippines, it is found out that liberalism is a common goal for most schools and this, in turn, poses significant changes to the nature of the Filipino student. Stress is evident and unavoidable in these circumstances.